The RAMAC purchase price and capacity sources are clearly given in the cited section and you are being disingenuous and argumentative by ignoring them, so just in case you choose to dispute this again here they are: The chart in Blackblaze clearly shows the price in 2013 starting well above $0.050 and descending below $0.50 but remaining well above $0.040, about at the $0.044 reached in September therefore, the average for 2013 is clearly below 0.050 and above 0.045 and nothing is "fabricated" other than perhaps your objection. Therefore, the two significant digits of 180 million are erroneous, incorrect false precision. The updated price of $10,000 has an honest-to-goodness (non-WP) inline citation, The number $0.050 is fabricated by the editor and the number is actually $0.05.
Tom94022 ( talk) 17:52, 26 August 2014 (UTC) WP:Verifiability is violated here: "Do not use articles from Wikipedia as sources." This inline citation (price of $9,200) is unverified because it merely points to Wikipedia, regardless of the purported source buried several layers deep: History_of_IBM_magnetic_disk_drives#IBM.27s_first_HDD_versus_its_last_HDDs WP:Citation needed is also violated: "If someone tagged your contributions with and you disagree, discuss the matter on the article's discussion page." You revert without discussing first. 045 200 million as proposed by the IP is misleading at best. I really don't understand the "false precision" comment, it seems to me that mathematically 9200/184 million which properly rounds to >180 and not >200. 180 million still has false precision $0.05 corresponds to 200 million.)Īctually the RAMAC price/$MB (a routine calculation) has its two components properly referenced on the cited page so it is indirectly referenced meeting the verifiability requirement, which I believe the IP knows, and according the WP:Verifiability the IP should have fixed the reference rather than blowing it away with a tag.
WP:Verifiability "Do not use articles from Wikipedia as sources." Must provide an underlying source (reference).
0 kommentar(er)
